bitcoin-hardfork.org
Living by editions

The paper's public work frontier

Continue This Work

Every unresolved claim should be able to name the work that could move it. These calls publish the proof bar, countercase, return, authority, and fulfillment rule before any contribution is judged.

17declared calls
17seed calls
0active intake routes
0fulfilled calls

How work returns

A contribution remains itself before it becomes ours

An exact candidate receipt preserves provenance, reproduction steps, requested attribution, and the strongest countercase. Acceptance is a separate typed human decision. Only accepted bytes move from the candidate store into canonical research.

Seed calls

Work with a declared proof bar

Seed means the question is specified; it does not mean intake is open.

call-normalize-existing-corpora

Adjudicate the remaining checked-in corpora

seed

Several checked-in sources remain inventoried but lack source-specific normalization and publication review.

The ask: Produce source-specific parsing receipts, raw-parent lineage, role classification, and separate privacy, rights, and proposition adjudication.

Proof bar

Every targeted source count reconciles to a deterministic normalized output or an explicit safe exclusion.

  • Normalization receipt
  • Disposition decisions
  • Typed proposition edges

Reproduce: Run the offline normalizer twice and byte-compare every output and receipt.

Strongest countercase

A parse can be reproducible while the source still lacks publication rights or factual support.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

The accepted receipt reconciles every named source and records each publication and proposition decision separately.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office (source-curator)
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c1 c2 u-evidenceExpected artifact evidence/candidates/remaining-corpora.json

call-reconcile-discord-exports

Recover and reconcile the named August 9 Discord export

seed

The specifically named August 9 (776) export is unavailable and cannot be replaced by a later capture.

The ask: Recover the exact bytes, verify the page-declared channel and capture time, and reconcile message identity against all retained exports.

Proof bar

The exact recovered bytes match a documented capture identity and all overlap arithmetic reconciles without substitution.

  • Content-addressed source
  • Capture receipt
  • Message overlap receipt

Reproduce: Recompute the original and container hashes, parse offline, and independently rerun the overlap calculation.

Strongest countercase

A similarly named or later Discord export is not evidence that these missing bytes were recovered.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

The named source has byte identity, lossless retention, exact reconciliation, and separate publication review.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office (source-curator)
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c1 c2 u-evidenceExpected artifact evidence/candidates/discord-2026-08-09-reconciliation.json

call-audit-legacy-scenario-assets

Bound the historical use of the retired scenario model

seed

The archived generator and output have an audit but no independently reproduced historical-claim disposition.

The ask: Reproduce the archive, compare it to the audit, and adjudicate any proposed historical use without reviving its winner claims.

Proof bar

An independent rerun explains every archive output and identifies exactly which historical claims remain supportable.

  • Reproduction receipt
  • Audit comparison
  • Typed claim decisions

Reproduce: Run the frozen archive in an isolated environment and compare exact outputs and assumptions to its audit.

Strongest countercase

Exact reproduction establishes what the program did, not that its assumptions describe real agents or adoption.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

A named independent reviewer accepts the reproduction and its explicit non-agent-model boundary.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c6 c7 c8 c11Expected artifact evidence/candidates/legacy-scenario-reproduction.json

call-adjudicate-akasha-reviews

Adjudicate the four Akasha adversarial reviews

seed

Four distinct adversarial reviews are inventoried but their critiques are not normalized or independently corroborated.

The ask: Preserve each review's provenance, normalize its propositions, and connect factual claims only to independent primary evidence.

Proof bar

Every review proposition has source provenance and a separate support, contradiction, bound, or insufficiency decision.

  • Review-specific normalized records
  • Typed proposition edges
  • Primary-source corroboration list

Reproduce: Regenerate each normalized review record from its exact retained parent and verify all referenced primary artifacts.

Strongest countercase

A forceful or convergent critique remains a hypothesis until its factual mechanics are independently established.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

All four reviews remain distinct and every admitted factual edge names independent corroborating evidence.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office (claim-adjudicator)
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c3-policy c4 c5 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/akasha-review-adjudication.json

call-grin-transition-outcomes

Measure owner-level outcomes across Grin proof-of-work transitions

seed

Grin's rules are captured, but owner-level hash, hardware access, pool choice, and upgrade failures are not adjudicated.

The ask: Join versioned consensus rules to dated network, pool, hardware, and owner-resolution evidence across each transition.

Proof bar

The study resolves beneficial owners and reports transition effects with uncertainty and an explicit attribution countercase.

  • Versioned rule timeline
  • Owner-resolution method
  • Transition outcome dataset

Reproduce: Rebuild the transition panel from primary rules and dated measurements using the submitted owner mapping.

Strongest countercase

Nominal pool or algorithm diversity can coexist with common beneficial ownership and synchronized upgrade failure.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the owner resolution, uncertainty bounds, and executable intervention mapping.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c10 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/grin-transition-outcomes.json

call-randomx-owner-outcomes

Test whether commodity CPU eligibility distributes ownership

seed

RandomX's design is sourced, but entry, owner distribution, botnet use, cloud use, and energy asymmetry are unadjudicated.

The ask: Submit reproducible benchmarks and time-series ownership evidence that separates pools, hosted fleets, cloud, and unauthorized compute.

Proof bar

Benchmarks report throughput, memory, power, cost, owner resolution, and voluntary participation under declared uncertainty.

  • Hardware benchmark matrix
  • Owner-resolution method
  • Unconsented-compute sensitivity analysis

Reproduce: Run the benchmark harness on declared machines and recompute ownership outcomes from the retained input panel.

Strongest countercase

CPU accessibility can concentrate around cheap power, cloud accounts, optimized software, and malware-controlled devices.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the hardware receipt and owner-level voluntary-participation analysis.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c10 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/randomx-owner-outcomes.json

call-asic-market-maturity

Test the mature commodity ASIC decentralization thesis

seed

Protocol operation is sourced, but manufacturing, finance, hosting, resale, firmware, and beneficial ownership remain unadjudicated.

The ask: Build a dated equipment cohort panel with supply, financing, hosting, resale, pool, and beneficial-owner evidence.

Proof bar

The panel reports owner-level access and concentration across equipment generations with disclosed attribution and missingness bounds.

  • Equipment cohort panel
  • Market access records
  • Beneficial-owner sensitivity analysis

Reproduce: Reconstruct cohort costs, efficiency, access, and owner concentration from the retained market and protocol sources.

Strongest countercase

Liquid used hardware can coexist with manufacturer finance, hosting, firmware, repair, and power concentration.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the cohort panel, owner mapping, and explicit concentration-return mechanisms.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c10 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/asic-market-maturity.json

call-multi-work-owner-control

Measure owner control and weak-lane risk in multi-work systems

seed

Multi-algorithm rules are documented, but common ownership, hopping, retarget behavior, and lane security budgets are not.

The ask: Join versioned per-lane rules to block, difficulty, stale, reorganization, rental-market, and beneficial-owner records.

Proof bar

Per-lane and combined outcomes identify common ownership, hopping, weak-lane attack cost, and reversal conditions.

  • Versioned lane rules
  • Per-lane history
  • Cross-lane owner graph

Reproduce: Recompute per-lane security, volatility, and owner concentration from the retained rules and histories.

Strongest countercase

Several algorithms can conceal one owner, weaken a small lane, or amplify rental and retarget attacks.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the lane rules, owner graph, and measured weak-lane countercase.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c3-scope c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/multi-work-owner-control.json

call-pool-role-separation

Field-test separation of template, accounting, payout, and broadcast control

seed

DATUM and Stratum V2 capabilities are sourced, while live adoption, fallback, censorship, payout dependence, and exit are not.

The ask: Measure deployment share, template differences, latency, invalid work, fallback, outages, payout terms, custody, and miner-controlled exit.

Proof bar

The field test attributes each accepted block's effective template, accounting, payout, broadcast, and fallback authority.

  • Deployment telemetry
  • Template-difference receipt
  • Exit and fallback tests

Reproduce: Replay retained telemetry through the declared role-attribution rules and reproduce every concentration metric.

Strongest countercase

Optional local templates can fail open to centralized defaults while payout or gateway dependence preserves control.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the telemetry, role attribution, and tested exit and fallback boundaries.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c4 c7 c8 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/pool-role-separation.json

call-verifier-resource-distribution

Benchmark full verification on ordinary and low-power hardware

seed

Block-weight rules are sourced, but validation, initial sync, reindex, reorganization, bandwidth, storage, and operator retention distributions are not.

The ask: Benchmark benign and adversarial workloads on priced low-power, household, hosted, and archival full-node classes.

Proof bar

The harness reproduces sync, validation, reindex, reorganization, memory, bandwidth, and storage results on declared machines.

  • Benchmark harness
  • Priced machine manifest
  • Raw timing and resource traces

Reproduce: Run the harness from clean state on at least two declared ordinary hardware classes and compare exact workload identities.

Strongest countercase

A small nominal block can still impose costly signatures, history, bursts, indexes, reorgs, or reindex work.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer reproduces the workload identities and validates the declared resource traces and machine prices.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c5 c10 c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/verifier-resource-benchmarks.json

call-calibrate-agent-actors

Calibrate persistent actors and their local information

seed

No admitted evidence yet calibrates persistent actor identities, resource budgets, local observations, actions, memory, or exit.

The ask: Propose empirical distributions and mappings for every active decision center without counting one beneficial owner several times.

Proof bar

Each active actor state and transition maps to admitted evidence, a declared stipulation, or an explicit unresolved range.

  • Actor ontology
  • Empirical mapping table
  • Conservation and identity tests

Reproduce: Rebuild every actor population and relationship graph from the submitted mappings and fixed semantic random keys.

Strongest countercase

More objects are not more agency when identities, policies, information, and consequences remain cloned or exogenous.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the ontology, evidence mappings, identity rules, and conservation tests.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c6 c7 c8 c11 c12Expected artifact research/agent_v2/calibration.json

call-test-agent-v2-regimes

Challenge agent-v2 against retrospective, held-out, and adversarial regimes

seed

Agent-v2 has no admitted retrospective, held-out, negative-control, or adversarial challenge suite.

The ask: Build dated fork and test-network panels, predeclare held-out cases, and test timestamp manipulation, migration, collusion, outage, and capture regimes.

Proof bar

Preregistered retrospective and held-out tests report calibration, failures, negative controls, and reversal conditions without retuning holdouts.

  • Preregistered challenge set
  • Retrospective results
  • Held-out results
  • Adversarial countercases

Reproduce: Execute all result-bearing challenge shards from immutable inputs and deep-compare canonical result bytes.

Strongest countercase

A model can reproduce one historical episode through equifinality while failing a held-out regime or intervention.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the preregistration, immutable inputs, full results, and disclosed empirical failures.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c6 c7 c8 c11 c12Expected artifact research/agent_v2/empirical_challenge.json

call-bind-launch-commitments

Collect exact hash-owner and economic-service commitments

seed

No launch manifest binds actual hash owners and economic services to one chain, effective time, scope, withdrawal policy, or abort condition.

The ask: Submit signed, attributable commitments that distinguish beneficial owner, facility, pool, service role, capacity, timing, withdrawal, and abort conditions.

Proof bar

Every commitment is authenticated, time-bounded, owner-resolved, role-specific, revocable under stated conditions, and independently countable once.

  • Signed commitment records
  • Owner and role resolution
  • Withdrawal and abort policy

Reproduce: Verify each signature and recompute coalition capacity and service coverage without double-counting owners or custodial claims.

Strongest countercase

Possible hardware, public enthusiasm, pool labels, and custodial assets are not committed honest work or economic service.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

Authenticated commitments reconcile by beneficial owner and role while preserving withdrawal and abort conditions.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office (source-curator)
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c1 c2 u-evidence c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/launch-commitments.json

call-specify-minimum-fork

Write one executable minimum fork specification

seed

No executable specification yet binds proof of work, DAA, limits, fork choice, replay, identifiers, split, emission, checkpoints, and emergency authority.

The ask: Write a versioned minimum specification with state transitions, test vectors, replay and fork-choice behavior, activation, failure, and withdrawal rules.

Proof bar

Two independent implementations accept and reject the same consensus, replay, fork-choice, split, checkpoint, and emergency test vectors.

  • Normative specification
  • Consensus test vectors
  • Two implementation receipts
  • Adversarial review

Reproduce: Run every normative vector against both independent implementations and byte-compare their declared state transitions.

Strongest countercase

Agreement on principles or labels does not resolve replay, tie-breaking, activation, checkpoint, or emergency behavior.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts matching implementation receipts, normative vectors, and the strongest unresolved protocol countercase.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c3-scope c4 c5 c10 c11 c12Expected artifact research/fork_spec/minimum-v1.md

call-deferred-security-mechanisms

Specify and test deferred security mechanism families

seed

Merged mining, non-outsourceable puzzles, weak-block rewards, emission, fees, and governance remain named but unadmitted families.

The ask: For one family at a time, provide primary sources, exact state transitions, historical outcomes, strongest failure, and an executable intervention.

Proof bar

Each submitted family isolates one mechanism, one historical or explicit unknown outcome, and one executable countercase.

  • Primary-source dossier
  • State-transition specification
  • Historical outcome review
  • Executable intervention test

Reproduce: Rebuild the mechanism record from primary sources and execute its intervention against an otherwise identical control.

Strongest countercase

A mechanism can shift control, create a new privileged actor, or merely rename concentration without reducing it.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

An independent reviewer accepts the primary-source record, isolated transition, executable control, and failure boundary.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c3-scope c11 c12Expected artifact evidence/candidates/deferred-security-mechanism.json

call-independent-agent-v2-review

Independently review the agent-v2 model and full prod1 receipt

seed

No independent reviewer has examined agent-v2 agency, conservation, causality, empirical adequacy, portability, or every result-bearing shard.

The ask: Reexecute all scientific shards, inspect the ODD and code, challenge invariances and countercases, and issue a signed bounded disposition.

Proof bar

A named independent reviewer reproduces every scientific result and explicitly accepts, bounds, or rejects each required model invariant.

  • Independent reexecution receipt
  • Code and ODD review
  • Invariant matrix
  • Signed disposition

Reproduce: Reexecute every result-bearing shard from the exact source revision and deep-compare canonical bytes across supported runtimes.

Strongest countercase

Reproducible code can remain conceptually invalid, empirically inadequate, or dependent on one runtime or allocation order.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

The signed review binds the exact source, receipts, reexecution bytes, invariant outcomes, limitations, and rejection conditions.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
model-reviewer
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c6 c7 c8 c11 c12Expected artifact research/agent_v2/reviews/independent-review.json

call-represented-speaker-correction

Correct a represented living speaker's words or meaning

seed

The paper needs a direct executable path for a represented living speaker to correct attributed words, context, identity, or editorial meaning.

The ask: Submit the exact quotation or interpretation, source locator, identity basis, requested correction, and strongest ambiguity through the direct correction route.

Proof bar

An appointed represented living speaker or verified authorized representative confirms the exact correction disposition against a retained source locator and stated ambiguity.

  • Correction request
  • Source locator
  • Identity or representation verification
  • Reasoned disposition

Reproduce: Compare the retained correction artifact with the cited source locator and the signed human disposition.

Strongest countercase

An asserted identity, translation, context, or representative authority can be mistaken, incomplete, or contested.

What returns

Accepted work receives permanent public provenance, requested contributor credit, and a public decision receipt.

Fulfilled when

The disposition preserves exact submitted bytes, requested correction, speaker authority, source locator, ambiguity, and a separate editorial-admission boundary.

People, credit, and return paths
Issuer
Star Heartsong, initial editorial office
Decision owner
represented-living-speaker
Canonizer
Star Heartsong (editorial-canonizer)
Requested attribution
contributor-specified; default name-or-pseudonym
Credit
Public provenance; requested attribution honored; coauthorship not-promised
Git route
pending .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/consensus-work.md
Non-Git route
pending contributions/submission-template.md
Correction route
pending contributions/correction-template.md
Affects c1Expected artifact evidence/candidates/represented-speaker-correction.json

Nomination is not submission

Public conversation can point; it cannot publish

Public chat can nominate evidence; it cannot submit or admit it. A nomination becomes reviewable only after it enters an approved route and receives an immutable candidate receipt.